2005 Grammys

I did not watch the Grammys last night, other than a few minutes when Alicia Keys was performing (and Jamie Foxx). Instead, I was finishing up South Park season 4 (Finger-bang-bang...), and Curb Your Enthusiasm season 1 on DVD.

But I did hear some of the news about who won what, and I'm wondering which of the following things diminishes the value of a Grammy award the least:

A. Ray Charles winning for best album over Kanye West, Usher, Alicia Keys, and Green Day
B. John Mayer winning for best song with "Daughters" (that's the best song of
C. Britney Spears winning for best dance recording with "Toxic"

I vote for "C". Yes I know I'm biased and yes I know, it's Britney Spears winning a Grammy, but hear me out.

A, I'm sure Ray Charles as an artist was very deserving of multiple Grammys throughout his career. But for this year, I'm pretty sure that any of the other albums that were nominated (Kanye West, Usher, Alicia Keys, Green Day) deserve the "Best Album" award more.

B, while it wasn't the strongest list of nominees, "Daughters" winning "Best Song" is still a joke. I think I wrote about how lame that song was back when they started playing it on the radio, and I still feel the same way. Overall I'm a John Mayer fan too. I just can't picture anyone looking back 10 years from now and saying, "wow, the best song in 2004 was John Mayer - 'Daughters'". Can you?